I think social software has much promise - I’m immersed in it so it’s easy to forget that it’s still a minority sport. It’s also easy to forget that it’s utterly overwhelming to a newcomer, so any Digg-like mechanism that helps us connect with what’s important to us is very welcome.

By the way - the post you commented on went up in July.

While I agree that software, in terms of traditional client server or network software has addressed level 2, I think that the social software is far from addressing many of these. IMHO (not so humble :)), social software has so many abilities to do this. The key component of social software and online communities is widespread sharing of information that helps us make better decisions which really hasn’t happened enough in the WEB world. Sites like digg, where people can share information is a start but most of the information share is focused more on entertainment. The current trend is more about levels 3 and 4 in the hierarchy. The share of safety related information and getting that information from reliable sources is still not there. Imagine the effect that things like missing person reports, amber alerts, or any other extremely useful information would have if shared by the network of people that the social sites promote. At any rate, you have some great thoughts here. Strangely, I blogged about this and Maslow over a week ago but with slightly different takes.

A lot of software supports self-actualisation because it’s what people use (often) to help them express themselves.

Whether there’s any that helps push people to the higher levels, I’ve no idea. I guess things like mind-mapping (and my own software - 25 years old and going strong, but I’d better not plug it here) helps people surface stuff about themselves they never knew they knew. Maybe they could be part of the process.

And the many ‘profile yourself’ bits of software might help identify areas that need development. I can’t think of one offhand, but I know they’re out there.

If anyone reading this knows of helpful software in this regard, please let us know. Thanks.

You have shown some remarkable insight to recognize how the development of software has paralleled Maslow’s 5 hierarchy of needs. Youtube has to be included into the mix. Following your theory, (and Maslow’s) Youtube would be the start of level 4. What’s next? Maybe developers of software will heed your theory and concentrate on developing for levels 4 and 5.

We have been attracting people as our targeted clients who want to fulfill level 5 of Maslow’s hierarchy for years. We explain and provide personally matched life coaches who want to become all they can be. Using life coach process has proven to be the fastest, least error filled, most fun, and most complete method for anyone who truly wants to achieve level five-self actualization.

I wonder how software can be developed to assist or supplement this level five achievement?

Now we have all manner of thinkers on all manner of subjects, attracting followers and networks of peers.

The ‘hierarchy’ you suggest would, presumably, be some kind of subject-matter hierarchy, not a popularity hierarchy. Of course, many advertisers and sponsors have a different view. They like focused popularity and who can blame them?

What I mean is that if I start a blog on electron spin resonance, I might attract a minuscule group of readers but, by heck, in that world they would be pretty influential.

I like the ‘gas’ analogy too, by the way.

Thanks for writing.

Please write again if I’ve got the wrong end of the stick.

The form in the ether, as it were, would be some
sort of vocabularistic nexus (Hempel’s “nomic nexus” with gravity points).

It will be interesting to see where it all goes.
The web is a fascinating new space, ever changing
based on man’s thirst. Huxley said it best: “We
are all individual elements of a great social gas.”

Cheers.