Here’s an interesting story that happens to tie in with another of my core activities. A franchise operation, the Dyno Group, has won an award as a good place to work.
Actually …
Here’s an interesting story that happens to tie in with another of my core activities. A franchise operation, the Dyno Group, has won an award as a good place to work.
Actually there’s a little more to it than that. The franchise’s parent company has won, so the franchise – which no doubt played its part alongside all of the other elements of the organisation – has claimed its share of the credit to garner some publicity. All good fun and part of the marketing mix.
I actually edit an annual book of top employers so I know a bit about how at least one of these schemes works, though, and I do wonder just how they’re awarded in this particular instance. A lot of organisations put themselves forward (mine doesn’t allow this, but it insists on a ‘contribution towards payment’ so there’s self-selection in that people can opt out by not wanting to pay). Then a researcher is sent in, usually, asks some questions and the employer fills in a questionnaire.
The end result can have a lot of value but one of the worst experiences I ever had was in trying to evaluate the Go Ahead Group, which is in transport. Although not a franchise operation it shared many of the features you might come across in looking at a franchised group, in that there were many affiliated businesses with their own structures. In this case there were also distinct and different company cultures within the group, and according to the article I’ve highlighted the same was true of the Dyno Group’s parent.
The question that occurred to me when I was writing about Go Ahead was: how do you write about company culture and assess an organisation like this as an employer when it’s actually not a single entity anyway? The Group itself felt I’d misunderstood the ethos and written a misleading profile anyway, so they pulled out of the scheme; the issue remains, though, that it’s difficult to judge a group when it consists of so many different parts.
I’m pleased for the Dyno Group and its parent, really I am. I’m just worried that the Dyno bit could have been responsible for the whole of or none of the practices that won the award – and nobody would ever know.
Commenting Is Easy
Do you agree with this blog post? Disagree? Have something to add that others might find helpful? Then please leave a comment in the box below.
If you'd like to have your image included next to your comments here, then you can set yourself up with an avatar in just a couple of clicks.