Readers of this blog will realise I’ve been banging on about the Government’s indecision in the case of Northern Rock, so you can understand why I’m a little relieved that they’ve …
Readers of this blog will realise I’ve been banging on about the Government’s indecision in the case of Northern Rock, so you can understand why I’m a little relieved that they’ve at last done something. Granted it was only because plan A had failed several times, which is infinitely less than ideal, but at least we now know where we stand. Existing loans won’t be hit and the bank is open for new deposits. I’m not exactly rushing to put my life savings into it.
That they’ve come to the decision at which they should have arrived months ago is evident to many. The Times’ Anatole Kaletsky explained the events in his column yesterday with his customary lucidity and also points out that the Government’s apparent objective is out of sync with any likely outcome. I can’t help agreeing.
More interestingly there’s a precedent. I’ll leave it to the BBC’s Evan Davis to explain it in his blog, but it seems this whole bank loses people’s confidence-state tries to find a buyer-state fails dismally and nationalises has been gone through at least once before.
Which makes it all the more bewildering that the Government didn’t take this step when it first became apparent it’d be a good idea – when, in the favourite word of our Prime Minister, it was prudent.
Commenting Is Easy
Do you agree with this blog post? Disagree? Have something to add that others might find helpful? Then please leave a comment in the box below.
If you'd like to have your image included next to your comments here, then you can set yourself up with an avatar in just a couple of clicks.